fallacy of division การใช้

:The fallacy that best describes this reasoning is the fallacy of division.
:Ok the point here is that fallacy of division is the more appropriate fallacy, rather than affirming the consequent.
The fallacy of composition is the converse of the fallacy of division; it may be contrasted with the case of emergence, where the whole possesses properties " not " present in the parts.
It's mostly you and Cyclopia using the argument from authority and the fallacy of division against a mixed bag of genuine sources that contradict your position along with a lot of incomprehensible jibber-jabber on everyone's part ( and I include myself ).
In the philosophy of the ancient Greek Anaxagoras, as claimed by the Roman atomist Lucretius, it was assumed that the atoms constituting a substance must themselves have the salient observed properties of that substance : so atoms of water would be wet, atoms of iron would be hard, atoms of wool would be soft, etc . This doctrine is called " homoeomeria ", and it depends on the fallacy of division.